Main Article Content
Abstract
This article argues that the contemporary Business and Human Rights framework, as crystallized in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), rests on a narrowed and depoliticized understanding of international human rights law that obscures the foundational role of international cooperation in development justice. It demonstrates that the earlier BHR project, from the 1970s through the Draft Norms in 2003, was embedded in a Right to Development (RtD)–based vision that conceived transnational corporate regulation as a problem of global economic governance, structural inequality, and popular sovereignty. Employing a doctrinal and historical method, the article reconstructs this trajectory through close analysis of UN documents, human rights instruments, and institutional practice. It shows how this normative horizon was progressively displaced by a managerial, risk-based paradigm centred on territorial state responsibility. The article then advances a systemic reinterpretation of the UNGPs through the RtD and the binding duty of international cooperation, reconfiguring the state duty to protect as a duty of transnational cooperative governance and repositioning corporate due diligence within a people-centred framework of development justice. It argues that this reinterpretation does not reject the UNGPs, but restores their capacity to address the structural and transnational dimensions of corporate power that the BHR project was originally created to confront.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Asif Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution ” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions ” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
